Mayfield v. Atlantic National Bank of Florida
This text of 470 So. 2d 816 (Mayfield v. Atlantic National Bank of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause is before us on appeal from an order removing appellant Mayfield as [817]*817guardian of Crawford’s property. The appeal was dismissed by order of this court dated November 5, 1984, because Mayfield failed to purge himself of contempt of the court below. The cross appeal remains, challenging the ruling that Mayfield need not account for a $20,200 discrepancy in the ward’s (Crawford’s) assets.
We affirm the trial court’s denial of the motion challenging the inventory, which is based on the determination that Mayfield need not account for the $20,200 discrepancy in the ward’s assets which arose before Mayfield was appointed guardian of the property. There was no discrepancy in the inventory during the guardianship.
We do not have before us at this time the issue of whether there was a breach of a fiduciary duty while Mayfield held a power of attorney.1
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
470 So. 2d 816, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1428, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayfield-v-atlantic-national-bank-of-florida-fladistctapp-1985.