Mayfield v. Abbott

Supreme Court of Kansas

Mayfield v. Abbott

72 P. 1100, 67 Kan. 829, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 351

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedJune 6, 1903

DocketNo. 12,724

StatusPublished

This text of 72 P. 1100 (Mayfield v. Abbott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mayfield v. Abbott, 72 P. 1100, 67 Kan. 829, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 351 (kan 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

On a claim for professional services as a physician and surgeon the judgment was in favor of the defendant. No complaint is made by plaintiff of rulings in submitting the case to the jury, and the only objection made by him is to the sufficiency of the testimony. An examination of the evidence satisfies us that there was enough testimony to take the case to the jury and to support the verdict.

Burch, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

On a claim for professional services as a physician and surgeon the judgment was in favor of the defendant. No complaint is made by plaintiff of rulings in submitting the case to the jury, and the only objection made by him is to the sufficiency of the testimony. An examination of the evidence satisfies us that there was enough testimony to take the case to the jury and to support the verdict.

Burch, J., not sitting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 P. 1100, 67 Kan. 829, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayfield-v-abbott-kan-1903.