Mayfair Restaurant Corp. v. Aires

180 A.2d 843, 1962 D.C. App. LEXIS 293
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided May 11, 1962·No. No. 2934·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, a publisher, for charges for advertisements of defendant restaurant corporation which appeared in plaintiff’s two weekly publications.

Both parties concede that an oral agreement was made early in 1959 and that the advertisements ran until November 1960, and that one payment was made by defendant in January 1960. The issues at trial were: (1) Was the agreement that the advertisements run on a “further notice” basis, as plaintiff claimed, or was the agreement for a one-month trial, with no commitment beyond that time, as defendant claimed; (2) whether the defendant at any time notified plaintiff to discontinue the advertisements; (3) whether the advertisements were in the form authorized by defendant; and (4) whether the single payment was on account or in full accord and satisfaction.

These issues were essentially factual, and the record discloses no reason for disturbing the judgment.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mayfair Restaurant Corp. v. Aires, 180 A.2d 843, 1962 D.C. App. LEXIS 293 (D.C. 1962).

180 A.2d 843 (Mayfair Restaurant Corp. v. Aires) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.