Mayes v. United Steel Workers

Fourth Circuit

Mayes v. United Steel Workers

458 F. App'x 245

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 15, 2011·No. No. 11-1918·Published

Opinion

[246]*246Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Debra Mayes appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss her complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mayes v. United Steel Workers, No. 3:11-cv-00149-GCM (W.D.N.C. Aug. 24, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[246]*246Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Debra Mayes appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss her complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mayes v. United Steel Workers, No. 3:11-cv-00149-GCM (W.D.N.C. Aug. 24, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Mayes v. United Steel Workers, 458 F. App'x 245 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

458 F. App'x 245 (Mayes v. United Steel Workers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.