Mayes v. Tippens

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 22, 2010
Docket10-2254
StatusUnpublished

This text of Mayes v. Tippens (Mayes v. Tippens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mayes v. Tippens, (4th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2254

DEBRA MAYES,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

RENEE TIPPENS,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

GRAPHIC PACKAGING INTERNATIONAL,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:10-cv-00410-RJC-DSC)

Submitted: December 9, 2010 Decided: December 22, 2010

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Debra Mayes, Appellant Pro Se. Mason Gardner Alexander, Jr., FISHER & PHILLIPS, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Debra Mayes seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying reconsideration of its order adopting the recommendation

of the magistrate judge and granting Defendant Renee Tippens’s

motion to dismiss the claims against Tippens. This court may

exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291

(2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28

U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial

Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Mayes

seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable

interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mayes v. Tippens, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayes-v-tippens-ca4-2010.