Mayes v. State
This text of 198 S.W.3d 622 (Mayes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order
David L. Mayes appeals from the denial of his motion to reopen his original Rule 29.15 hearing. Mayes’ sole point on appeal is that the motion court erred in denying his motion to reopen his original post-conviction proceedings for the purpose of conducting an independent inquiry into post-conviction counsel’s non-compliance with Rule 29.15(e) as required by rule, thus violating his right to due process as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 10 of the Missouri Constitution, in that had the motion court conducted an inquiry into counsel’s inaction, *623 Mayes would have been entitled to reopen his original Rule 29.15 proceedings.
Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
198 S.W.3d 622, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1110, 2006 WL 1983051, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayes-v-state-moctapp-2006.