Mayes v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Mayes v. State

908 S.W.2d 803, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1485, 1995 WL 507546

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mayes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1527 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 29, 1995·No. No. 66837·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court dismissed defendant’s motion because he faded to file it within ninety days after he was delivered to the custody of the Department of Corrections as provided in Rule 24.035(b). The court’s finding and conclusion is not clearly erroneous, and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court dismissed defendant’s motion because he faded to file it within ninety days after he was delivered to the custody of the Department of Corrections as provided in Rule 24.035(b). The court’s finding and conclusion is not clearly erroneous, and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Mayes v. State, 908 S.W.2d 803, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1485, 1995 WL 507546 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

908 S.W.2d 803 (Mayes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.