Mayes v. Pierce

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Mayes v. Pierce

145 S.E. 891, 38 Ga. App. 814, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 463

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedDecember 11, 1928

Docket19115

StatusPublished

This text of 145 S.E. 891 (Mayes v. Pierce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mayes v. Pierce, 145 S.E. 891, 38 Ga. App. 814, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 463 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. In tlie light of the charg'e as a whole and the facts of the ease, none of the exceptions to the charge require a reversal of the judgment.

2. Under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court, a ground of a motion for a new trial complaining of the admission of documentary evidence can not be considered by the reviewing court where the evidence is not set forth in the ground nor attached as an exhibit thereto.

3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error for any reason assigned.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI