Mayes v. Livingston

762 N.W.2d 493

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided March 23, 2009·No. 137930·Published

Opinion

762 N.W.2d 493 (2009)

Amanda E. MAYES, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Nathaniel LIVINGSTON, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 137930, COA No. 288148.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

March 23, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 16, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

762 N.W.2d 493 (2009)

Amanda E. MAYES, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Nathaniel LIVINGSTON, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 137930, COA No. 288148.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

March 23, 2009.

Order

Mayes v. Livingston, 762 N.W.2d 493 (Mich. 2009).

Pincite

762 N.W.2d 493 (Mayes v. Livingston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Amanda E. MAYES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nathaniel LIVINGSTON, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

Order

Amanda E. MAYES, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Nathaniel LIVINGSTON, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.