Mayes v. Industrial Accident Board

278 U.S. 568, 49 S. Ct. 83, 73 L. Ed. 510, 1928 U.S. LEXIS 354
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 26, 1928·No. No. 531·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied.for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the unprinted record herein submitted, -finds that there is. no federal question upon which certiorari can be issued, application for which is therefore also denied. The costs already incurred herein by direction of the Court shall be paid by the Clerk from the special fund in his custody as provided in the; order of October 29, 1926.,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mayes v. Industrial Accident Board, 278 U.S. 568, 49 S. Ct. 83, 73 L. Ed. 510, 1928 U.S. LEXIS 354 (1928).

278 U.S. 568 (Mayes v. Industrial Accident Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Satoko Matsumoto v. Tatsuya Matsumoto
792 A.2d 1222 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2002)
Palmer v. Fitzpatrick
557 P.2d 203 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1976)
Yeakel v. Meyer
337 P.2d 597 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1959)
Irvin v. State
139 N.E.2d 898 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1957)
Cramer v. Driesbach
287 P.2d 981 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1955)