Mayes v. City of Hammond
This text of 290 F. App'x 945 (Mayes v. City of Hammond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
These consolidated appeals were argued on September 27, 2007. Nearly six [946]*946months later we granted the parties’ motion to stay proceedings pending the outcome of their settlement efforts. On June 26, 2008, the parties filed a joint motion to vacate the underlying jury verdict and judgment as a condition to the proposed settlement agreement they had reached. We issued a limited remand to the district court to allow the court to inform us if it was inclined to vacate the jury verdict and judgment. See U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall Partnership, 513 U.S. 18, 115 S.Ct. 386, 130 L.Ed.2d 233 (1994); Marseilles Hydro Power LLC v. Marseilles Land & Water Co., 481 F.3d 1002 (7th Cir.2007). In response the district court issued an Opinion and Order on August 15, 2008, 2008 WL 3874685, advising us that it is inclined to grant the joint request to vacate the jury verdict and judgment. Accordingly, the case is REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
290 F. App'x 945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayes-v-city-of-hammond-ca7-2008.