Mayers v. Smith
This text of Mayers v. Smith (Mayers v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6990
CARL KOFI MAYERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TOMMIE SMITH, Officer, acting in his individual capacity and under color of law; JOHN DOE,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Party in Interest.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-1961-AM)
Submitted: September 12, 2002 Decided: September 23, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carl Kofi Mayers, Appellant Pro Se. Steven E. Gordon, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Carl Kofi Mayers appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his complaint against two federal correctional officers
under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2000). We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Mayers v.
Smith, No. CA-00-1961-AM (E.D. Va. April 4 2002; May 29, 2002). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mayers v. Smith, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayers-v-smith-ca4-2002.