Mayers v. Smith

Fourth Circuit

Mayers v. Smith

46 F. App'x 208

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 23, 2002·No. No. 02-6990·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Carl Kofi Mayers appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint against two federal correctional officers under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Mayers v. Smith, No. CA-00-1961-AM (E.D. Va. April 4, 2002; May 29, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Carl Kofi Mayers appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint against two federal correctional officers under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Mayers v. Smith, No. CA-00-1961-AM (E.D. Va. April 4, 2002; May 29, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Mayers v. Smith, 46 F. App'x 208 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

46 F. App'x 208 (Mayers v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related