Mayers v. Smith

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 23, 2002
Docket02-6990
StatusUnpublished

This text of Mayers v. Smith (Mayers v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mayers v. Smith, (4th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6990

CARL KOFI MAYERS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

TOMMIE SMITH, Officer, acting in his individual capacity and under color of law; JOHN DOE,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Party in Interest.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-1961-AM)

Submitted: September 12, 2002 Decided: September 23, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carl Kofi Mayers, Appellant Pro Se. Steven E. Gordon, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Carl Kofi Mayers appeals the district court’s orders

dismissing his complaint against two federal correctional officers

under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2000). We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Mayers v.

Smith, No. CA-00-1961-AM (E.D. Va. April 4 2002; May 29, 2002). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 1915A
28 U.S.C. § 1915A

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mayers v. Smith, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayers-v-smith-ca4-2002.