Mayer v. Stern

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mayer v. Stern

22 A.D. 628

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 1, 1897·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam :

The case of Palmer v. VanSantvoord (153 N. Y. 612) seems to hold that the -appellant is an employee within the stab[629] ute and entitled to a preference in respect to his wages» and as the motion below appears to have been disposed of entirely upon the assumption that the appellant was not entitled to such preference, we think the order should be reversed with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the matter remitted to the court below for -a, rehearing. Present— Van Brunt, P. J., Barrett, Rumsey, Williams, and Patterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

The case of Palmer v. VanSantvoord (153 N. Y. 612) seems to hold that the -appellant is an employee within the stab[629] ute and entitled to a preference in respect to his wages» and as the motion below appears to have been disposed of entirely upon the assumption that the appellant was not entitled to such preference, we think the order should be reversed with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the matter remitted to the court below for -a, rehearing. Present— Van Brunt, P. J., Barrett, Rumsey, Williams, and Patterson, JJ.

Mayer v. Stern, 22 A.D. 628 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1897).

Pincite

22 A.D. 628 (Mayer v. Stern) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related