Mayer v. State
53 N.W. 444, 83 Wis. 339, 1892 Wisc. LEXIS 204
This text of 53 N.W. 444 (Mayer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mayer v. State, 53 N.W. 444, 83 Wis. 339, 1892 Wisc. LEXIS 204 (Wis. 1892).
Opinion
The conviction must be affirmed. The case is ruled by the decision in Peitz v. State, 68 Wis. 538. The only difference between the two cases is that in the Peitz Case the sale was made direct to the consumer, while here it was made to a dealer. No distinction between the two cases is made by the excise law. The terms of the statute cover both oases equally.
By the Court.— Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Duluth Brewing & Malting Co. v. City of Superior
123 F. 353 (Seventh Circuit, 1903)
Michels v. State
90 N.W. 1096 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1902)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
53 N.W. 444, 83 Wis. 339, 1892 Wisc. LEXIS 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayer-v-state-wis-1892.