Mayer v. Siebert Motors, Inc.
This text of 264 A.D. 989 (Mayer v. Siebert Motors, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the evidence presented questions of fact for the jury. We think it was for the jury to say whether or not decedent was in the attic in the performance of his duties under the contract. AE concur. (The judgment dismisses the complaint in a negligence action.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
264 A.D. 989, 37 N.Y.S.2d 568, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayer-v-siebert-motors-inc-nyappdiv-1942.