Mayer v. Louis
12 Abb. Pr. 5
This text of 12 Abb. Pr. 5 (Mayer v. Louis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mayer v. Louis, 12 Abb. Pr. 5 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1872).
Opinion
The defense demurred to is bad, because it does not show that the contract was governed by the laws of Ohio, or made to be performed in that State.
• By section 326 of the Code, the laws of a foreign State may be read from the published volume of the laws. The law cited by the plaintiff shows that the rate of interest charged is allowed by that State.
Judgment for plaintiff, on demurrer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lintzenich v. Stevens
3 N.Y.S. 394 (New York Supreme Court, 1888)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
12 Abb. Pr. 5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayer-v-louis-nysupct-1872.