Mayer v. Fernandez
This text of 286 A.D. 806 (Mayer v. Fernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The motions of the defendant unions made in December, 1954, to vacate the permanent injunction should have been granted as the situation between the parties had materially changed. The State Labor Relations Board had found plaintiffs guilty of unfair labor practices against their employees and against the defendant unions, and had declared the independent union to be a company union created at the behest of plaintiffs. Picketing against unfair labor practices is a lawful and legitimate labor objective under the laws of this State (Wood v. O’Grady, 307 N. Y. 532, 539, 540). Orders unanimously reversed and the motions to vacate the injunction granted, with $10 costs. Settle order on notice. Concur — Cohn, J. P., Callahan, Breitel, Botein and Rabin, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
286 A.D. 806, 141 N.Y.S.2d 416, 36 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2303, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayer-v-fernandez-nyappdiv-1955.