Mayer v. Bruns
15 Misc. 695, 37 N.Y.S. 1021
This text of 15 Misc. 695 (Mayer v. Bruns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mayer v. Bruns, 15 Misc. 695, 37 N.Y.S. 1021 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1896).
Opinion
The order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs, for the reason stated in the opinion of the Special Term justice; besides it is undisputed that the motion was not made by the plaintiff’s attorney of record. .
McCarthy and Botty, JJ., concur.
Order affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
15 Misc. 695, 37 N.Y.S. 1021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayer-v-bruns-nynyccityct-1896.