Mayer v. Bristow

741 N.E.2d 896, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1433, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 347
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 7, 2001
Docket99-2216 and 00-56
StatusPublished

This text of 741 N.E.2d 896 (Mayer v. Bristow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mayer v. Bristow, 741 N.E.2d 896, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1433, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 347 (Ohio 2001).

Opinion

Crawford App. No. 3-98-29. Reported at 91 Ohio St.3d 3, 740 N.E.2d 656. On motion for reconsideration and on amicus curiae motion for leave to file under S.Ct.Prac.R. XI by Laurence A. Neuton. Motions denied.

Douglas, J., dissents. Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mayer v. Bristow
2000 Ohio 109 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
741 N.E.2d 896, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1433, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayer-v-bristow-ohio-2001.