Mayer & Lowenstein v. Chattahoochee National Bank
46 Ga. 606
Opinion
We think this ease controlled by sections 3456 and 3447 of the Code, and, as we understand those sections, they compel us to reverse the judgment of the Court below. Our judgment is fully set forth in the head note.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mayer & Lowenstein v. Chattahoochee National Bank, 46 Ga. 606 (Ga. 1872).
46 Ga. 606 (Mayer & Lowenstein v. Chattahoochee National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Parker v. Kilgo
137 S.E.2d 333 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1964)
Smith v. Hartrampf
127 S.E.2d 814 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
Jones v. Bibb Brick Co.
48 S.E. 25 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)
Smith, Thorndike & Brown Co. v. Mutual Fire Insurance
86 N.W. 241 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1901)
Flournoy & Epping v. Rutledge
73 Ga. 735 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1884)