Mayel Perez-Valencia v. Jared Rardin

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Mayel Perez-Valencia, Civ. No. 26-2865 (JWB/LIB)

Petitioner,

v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Jared Rardin, OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Respondent.

United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on July 28, 2026. (Doc. No. 8.) No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time permitted. Absent timely objections, the R&R is reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the R&R, no clear error is found. ORDER Based on the R&R of the Magistrate Judge, and on all the files, records, and proceedings in this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The July 28, 2026 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 8) is ACCEPTED. 2. Petitioner Mayel Perez-Valencia’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED. 3. This case is DISMISSED. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Date: August 20, 2026 s/ Jerry W. Blackwell JERRY W. BLACKWELL United States District Judge