Maycroft v. Maycroft

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Maycroft v. Maycroft

139 N.W. 1134, 120 Minn. 529, 1913 Minn. LEXIS 707

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJanuary 24, 1913

DocketNos. 17,880—(157)

StatusPublished

This text of 139 N.W. 1134 (Maycroft v. Maycroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maycroft v. Maycroft, 139 N.W. 1134, 120 Minn. 529, 1913 Minn. LEXIS 707 (Mich. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant filed a claim against the estate of her deceased brother for services. The probate court allowed the same in part,, and the administratrix appealed to the district court, where, upon trial, a decision was rendered and judgment entered disallowing the claim in toto, and reversing the probate court. From such judgment this appeal has been taken.

The appeal presents no question of law. The findings of the trial court to the effect that claimant was received and remained as a member of the family of her deceased brother, and that there was no express or implied agreement that she should receive compensation for any services she did render for her brother while so residing with him, are amply sustained by the evidence. No useful purpose will be served by a recital or discussion of the testimony.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant filed a claim against the estate of her deceased brother for services. The probate court allowed the same in part,, and the administratrix appealed to the district court, where, upon trial, a decision was rendered and judgment entered disallowing the claim in toto, and reversing the probate court. From such judgment this appeal has been taken.

The appeal presents no question of law. The findings of the trial court to the effect that claimant was received and remained as a member of the family of her deceased brother, and that there was no express or implied agreement that she should receive compensation for any services she did render for her brother while so residing with him, are amply sustained by the evidence. No useful purpose will be served by a recital or discussion of the testimony.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 N.W. 1134, 120 Minn. 529, 1913 Minn. LEXIS 707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maycroft-v-maycroft-minn-1913.