Maybusher v. State
739 So. 2d 1210, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10476, 1999 WL 565890
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 4, 1999
DocketNo. 99-1923
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 739 So. 2d 1210 (Maybusher v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Maybusher v. State, 739 So. 2d 1210, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10476, 1999 WL 565890 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
Opinions
Affirmed without prejudice to file a proper rule 3.800(a) motion.
After some 18 years from appellant’s conviction and sentence, the denial of his rule 3.800(a) motion, contending alleged illegality of sentence based on facts appellant must have known at the time of his 1981 sentence, should simply be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Woodson v. State
739 So. 2d 1210 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
739 So. 2d 1210, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10476, 1999 WL 565890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maybusher-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.