Maybusher v. State

739 So. 2d 1210, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10476, 1999 WL 565890
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 4, 1999·No. No. 99-1923·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to file a proper rule 3.800(a) motion.

After some 18 years from appellant’s conviction and sentence, the denial of his rule 3.800(a) motion, contending alleged illegality of sentence based on facts appellant must have known at the time of his 1981 sentence, should simply be affirmed.

KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur. POLEN, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maybusher v. State, 739 So. 2d 1210, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10476, 1999 WL 565890 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

739 So. 2d 1210 (Maybusher v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Woodson v. State
739 So. 2d 1210 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)