Maybin v. State

340 S.W.3d 265, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 459, 2011 WL 1234321
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 5, 2011
DocketWD 71955
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 340 S.W.3d 265 (Maybin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maybin v. State, 340 S.W.3d 265, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 459, 2011 WL 1234321 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

*266 Order

PER CURIAM:

Brent Maybin appeals the Circuit Court of Jackson County’s (“motion court”) denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15. Maybin’s motion alleges that his trial counsel was ineffective in advising him not to testify at trial. We affirm the judgment of the motion court. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Lloyd
340 S.W.3d 265 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
340 S.W.3d 265, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 459, 2011 WL 1234321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maybin-v-state-moctapp-2011.