Maybin v. Coulon

4 U.S. 259
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 15, 1804
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 4 U.S. 259 (Maybin v. Coulon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maybin v. Coulon, 4 U.S. 259 (1804).

Opinion

By the Court.

— There is a just debt due from the defendant Coulon, to the plaintiff, Maybin ; and therefore, so far as the court could lawfully act, *3001 tlley would be desirous to affirm the *report of the referees. Hence, •* we listened, with particular attention and favor, to the attempt of the plaintiff’s counsel to distinguish the origin of the sum reported, from the general mass of the illicit transaction. The attempt has not, however, been successful; so that we must decide the question on the principles of law, which are clearly established by the authorities that have been cited.

The positive provisions of the laws of the United States, respecting American registered vessels ; the national policy of our navigation system; good faith towards the belligerent powers; and the very foundations of morality ; have been violated in the course of the transaction, now exhibited to us. The act of the court is necessary to give effect to the report of the referees : but no court of justice of the United States can lend its aid, at any time, or in any degree, to recover a debt originating in a source so forbidden, so foul and so pernicious. The report cannot, therefore, be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vencil C. Green v. D. Stribling
E.D. California, 2025
Alvarez-Machain v. United States
107 F.3d 696 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 U.S. 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maybin-v-coulon-pa-1804.