Mayberry v. State

430 So. 2d 908
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 14, 1982
Docket81-1867
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 430 So. 2d 908 (Mayberry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mayberry v. State, 430 So. 2d 908 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

430 So.2d 908 (1982)

Gary F. MAYBERRY, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 81-1867.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

December 14, 1982.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Sara Bresky Blumberg, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Jack Ludin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HUBBART, C.J., and BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant Gary F. Mayberry appeals his conviction for second degree murder and aggravated child abuse. He contends that it was reversible error for the trial court (a) to allow evidence of prior bad acts in which it was shown that the defendant abused his deceased son on two occasions approximately three months prior to the son's murder by child abuse, and (b) to deny a motion for severance of counts as the defendant was prejudiced in presenting an insanity defense. We reject both contentions and affirm the adjudications and sentences under review.

First, we are persuaded that evidence of the prior bad acts below was admissible as relevant to establish criminal intent, motive, common scheme and absence of mistake. Wooten v. State, 398 So.2d 963 (Fla. 1st DCA), pet. for rev. dism., 407 So.2d 1107 (Fla. 1981). Second, there is no showing in this record that the failure to sever the two counts charged created, as urged, a legal or factual impediment to the proper presentation of the defendant's insanity defense on the murder charge; moreover, the subject offenses were clearly joinable. Jacobs v. State, 396 So.2d 713, 717 (Fla. 1981).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vincent v. State
885 So. 2d 963 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Billie v. State
863 So. 2d 323 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
State v. Wright
1999 SD 50 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1999)
State v. Taylor
701 A.2d 389 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1997)
Schwarz v. State
695 So. 2d 452 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Evans v. State
693 So. 2d 1096 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Worden v. State
603 So. 2d 581 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Ganadry v. State
589 So. 2d 1044 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
State v. Everette
532 So. 2d 1124 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Jackson v. State
522 So. 2d 802 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Warren v. State
475 So. 2d 1027 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
430 So. 2d 908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayberry-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.