Mayberry v. Mayberry

390 F. App'x 228
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 4, 2010·No. No. 09-8213·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carlos R. Mayberry appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983'(2006) complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with a court order to particularize his complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The.order Mayberry seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appeal-able interlocutory or collateral order. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1067 (4th Cir.1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mayberry v. Mayberry, 390 F. App'x 228 (4th Cir. 2010).

390 F. App'x 228 (Mayberry v. Mayberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related