Maybelle Workman v. Real Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc

200 F.2d 200
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedOctober 7, 1952
Docket4559_1
StatusPublished

This text of 200 F.2d 200 (Maybelle Workman v. Real Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maybelle Workman v. Real Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc, 200 F.2d 200 (10th Cir. 1952).

Opinion

200 F.2d 200

Maybelle WORKMAN
v.
REAL SILK HOSIERY MILLS, Inc.

No. 4559.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

October 7, 1952.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma.

No appearance for appellant.

Richardson, Cochran, Dudley, Fowler & Rucks, Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellee.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and HUXMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Docketed and dismissed October 7, 1952, on motion of appellee, for failure of appellant diligently to prosecute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200 F.2d 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maybelle-workman-v-real-silk-hosiery-mills-inc-ca10-1952.