Maya v. Elko, County of
Opinion
3 JORGE MAYA, Case No.: 3:19-cv-00379-MMD-WGC
4 Plaintiff, Order
5 v.
6 ELKO COUNTY JAIL, et al.,
7 Defendants.
9 Plaintiff, who is an inmate in the Elko County Jail, filed his application for leave to proceed 10 in forma pauperis (IFP) and pro se complaint on July 5, 2019. (ECF Nos. 1, 1-1.) The complaint 11 asserts that his constitutional rights were violated by Elko County and others because he is a 12 diabetic and Elko County Jail has been serving him nothing but starch and sugar despite his 13 complaints that this will be detrimental to his health condition. The complaint is in line to be 14 screened under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, which requires the court to "review, before docketing, if 15 feasible or, in any event, as soon as practicable after docketing, a complaint in a civil action in 16 which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a 17 governmental entity.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In conducting this review, the court “shall identify 18 cognizable claims or dismiss the complaint, or any portion of the complaint, if the complaint-- (1) 19 is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; or (2) seeks 20 monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1)-(2). 21 On November 19, 2019, Plaintiff filed two letters with the court. (ECF Nos. 3 and 4.) 22 Plaintiff states that he has HIV and he has not been given his HIV medications at the Elko 23 County Jail for ten days. He has complained to jail officials, to no avail. 1 The court is concerned by Plaintiff's assertions; however, the complaint that is awaiting 2 screening raises claims about the food Plaintiff is being served at the jail and its impact on his 3 diabetes. It does not currently assert a claim regarding not being given his HIV medications. 4 Plaintiff has written letters to the court about his HIV medications, but it appears he is seeking an
5 order from the court requiring that the jail provide him with his medications. This is known as 6 injunctive relief. In addressing a motion for injunctive relief, the court is constrained in that "there 7 must be a relationship between the injury claimed in the motion for injunctive relief and the 8 conduct asserted in the underlying complaint." Pacific Radiation Oncology, LLC v. Queen's 9 Medical Center, 810 F.3d 631, 636 (9th Cir. 2015). That relationship is not currently present here 10 because there is no nexus between the claim that he is being provided food that could be 11 detrimental to a person with diabetes, and his more recent assertion that he is not being given his 12 HIV medication. "Absent that relationship or nexus, the district court lacks authority to grant the 13 relief requested." Id. "Though new assertions of misconduct might support additional claims 14 against a defendant, they do not support [injunctive relief] entirely unrelated to the conduct
15 asserted in the underlying complaint." Id. 16 Therefore, in order for the court to address Plaintiff's request for an order concerning the 17 administration of his HIV medication, Plaintiff must: 18 (1) file an amended complaint as soon as possible that asserts allegations both as to meals 19 he is being served and the impact on his diabetes AND the failure to provide him with his HIV 20 medications. The amended complaint must be complete in and of itself without referring or 21 incorporating by reference any previous complaint. Any allegations, parties, or requests for relief 22 from a prior complaint that are not carried forwarded in the amended complaint will no longer be 23 before the court. Plaintiff shall clearly title the amended pleading as “AMENDED COMPLAINT.” 1 The Clerk shall SEND Plaintiff a form section 1983 complaint for this purpose. If Plaintiff fails 2 to file an amended complaint within the 30 days, the court will proceed with screening the original 3 complaint in due course. 4 (2) file a motion for a temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunction under
5 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65. This motion must address the following factors: (1) whether 6 the party seeking the relief is likely to succeed on the merits of the claim at issue; (2) whether there 7 is a likelihood of irreparable injury in the absence of injunctive relief; (3) whether the balance of 8 hardships tips in favor of the moving party; and (4) whether injunctive relief is in the public 9 interest. In addition, to issue a temporary restraining order without written or oral notice to the 10 adverse party or its attorney, Plaintiff must set forth in an affidavit or in a verified complaint 11 specific facts that show that immediate and irreparable injury, loss or damage will result before 12 the adverse party can be heard. 13 Again, until these documents are filed the court cannot take action on Plaintiff's request for 14 an order concerning administration of his HIV medication.
16 Dated: November 20, 2019. 17 _________________________________ William G. Cobb 18 United States Magistrate Judge
19 20 21 22 23
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Maya v. Elko, County of (Maya v. Elko, County of) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.