Maya v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Maya v. Coughlin

216 A.D.2d 614, 627 N.Y.S.2d 581, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5901

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 1, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 216 A.D.2d 614 (Maya v. Coughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maya v. Coughlin, 216 A.D.2d 614, 627 N.Y.S.2d 581, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5901 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule prohibiting unhygienic acts as a result of an incident in which he threw feces at another inmate. Contrary to petitioner’s contention, we find that the hearing was completed within the requisite time period. We further find that notwithstanding the absence of eyewitness testimony, the misbehavior report and the testimony of the correction officer who prepared it provide substantial evidence supporting the administrative determination of guilt. We have examined petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

[615]*615Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule prohibiting unhygienic acts as a result of an incident in which he threw feces at another inmate. Contrary to petitioner’s contention, we find that the hearing was completed within the requisite time period. We further find that notwithstanding the absence of eyewitness testimony, the misbehavior report and the testimony of the correction officer who prepared it provide substantial evidence supporting the administrative determination of guilt. We have examined petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

[615]*615Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

216 A.D.2d 614, 627 N.Y.S.2d 581, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maya-v-coughlin-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack