May v. Union Dime Savings Bank
This text of 243 A.D. 815 (May v. Union Dime Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order and summary judgment entered thereon unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. We are of the opinion that the entry on November 6, 1914, in the pass book issued by defendant to plaintiff’s testatrix, crediting accrued interest on the account to July 1, 1914, constitutes a deposit and renders the account active and entitles plaintiff to the accrued interest sued for within the meaning of defendant’s by-laws, which provide that “ all accounts to which no deposit * * * shall have been made for twenty years in succession, shall be closed, nor shall the amount deposited, nor the interest that has accrued thereon, draw any interest thereafter.” The statute (Banking Law, § 274), enacted subsequently to the opening of the account is merely declaratory of pre-existing law. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Johnston, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
243 A.D. 815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/may-v-union-dime-savings-bank-nyappdiv-1935.