May v. State

632 S.W.2d 751, 1982 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 927
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 26, 1982
Docket66248
StatusPublished
Cited by22 cases

This text of 632 S.W.2d 751 (May v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
May v. State, 632 S.W.2d 751, 1982 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 927 (Tex. 1982).

Opinion

*752 OPINION ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

ONION, Presiding Judge.

On original submission, a majority of this court affirmed appellant’s conviction for capital murder wherein the punishment was assessed at death. May v. State, 618 S.W.2d 333 (Tex.Cr.App.1981). Thereafter, appellant successfully petitioned the Supreme Court of the United States for a writ of certiorari. On November 2, 1981, the judgment of conviction was vacated by the Supreme Court and the case remanded to this court for further consideration in light of Adams v. Texas, 448 U.S. 38, 100 S.Ct. 2521, 65 L.Ed.2d 581 (1980). See May v. Texas, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 497, 70 L.Ed.2d 37 (1981).

The record now reflects that on April 30, 1982 a proclamation was signed by The Honorable William P. Clements, Jr., Governor of the State of Texas, purporting to “grant” the appellant a commutation of sentence from death to life imprisonment. 1 In light of the Governor’s action, any error in light of Adams v. Texas, supra, no longer exists, and we are now compelled to apply the disposition directed by the majority in Adams v. State, 624 S.W.2d 568 (Tex.Cr.App.1981), and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, J., concurs.
1

. Judges Clinton and Teague and this writer remain convinced that commutation is not for resentencing prisoners whose sentences have been vacated, but rather, an act appropriate for reducing existing sentences. See Adams v. State, supra (Dissenting Opinion).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Acuna, Robert Aaron
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005
Trigg Martin Lawler v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995
Miniel v. State
831 S.W.2d 310 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1992)
Callins v. State
780 S.W.2d 176 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1989)
Ex Parte May
717 S.W.2d 84 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1986)
Kunkle v. State
771 S.W.2d 435 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1986)
Creel v. State
710 S.W.2d 120 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1986)
Cabanas v. State
698 S.W.2d 405 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1985)
Thompson v. State
691 S.W.2d 627 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1984)
McElroy v. State
667 S.W.2d 856 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1984)
Gamez v. State
665 S.W.2d 124 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1983)
Barnhart v. State
648 S.W.2d 696 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1983)
Mathis v. State
650 S.W.2d 532 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1983)
Hartfield v. State
645 S.W.2d 436 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1983)
Ex Parte English
642 S.W.2d 482 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
632 S.W.2d 751, 1982 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/may-v-state-texcrimapp-1982.