May v. State

179 S.W.2d 563, 147 Tex. Crim. 204, 1944 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 898
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in May v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 146 Tex. Crim. 115
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 1, 1944·No. No. 22779.·Published

Opinions

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Unlawfully selling whiskey is the offense; the punishment, a fine of $100.00.

Appellant insists that the undisputed facts show that he acted only as the agent of the purchaser of the whiskey, and not *205 as the seller thereof. As to this, we note, that, upon cross-examination of appellant, and upon his being shown the bottle of whiskey which the State’s witnesses identified as having been acquired from appellant, he said: “I am pretty sure that is the whiskey I sold Mr. Burney.” (The purchaser 'named in the information.) Such an admission on the part of the appellant was ■ sufficient to raise an issue for the jury — to- say nothing of the State’s testimony on the subject.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

May v. State, 179 S.W.2d 563, 147 Tex. Crim. 204, 1944 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 898 (Tex. 1944).

179 S.W.2d 563 (May v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Latham v. State
160 S.W. 455 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)