May v. State
232 S.W.3d 708, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1271, 2007 WL 2700559
Opinion
ORDER
Loren May, Jr. appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion following an evidentiary hearing. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.
AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
May v. State, 232 S.W.3d 708, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1271, 2007 WL 2700559 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).
232 S.W.3d 708 (May v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Peterson
232 S.W.3d 708 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)