May v. State

581 So. 2d 259, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6882, 1991 WL 119676
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 3, 1991
DocketNo. 90-02441
StatusPublished

This text of 581 So. 2d 259 (May v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
May v. State, 581 So. 2d 259, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6882, 1991 WL 119676 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal of appellant’s judgment and sentence for aggravated child abuse. We affirm without discussion the judgment but remand the sentence for correction of a scrivener’s error.

The order withholding adjudication of guilt and placing appellant in community control erroneously states that appellant entered a plea of nolo contendere. As appellant was convicted at bench trial, this apparent scrivener’s error must be corrected.

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed, and the sentence is reversed and remanded for correction of the scrivener’s error.

BOOTH and NIMMONS, JJ., and WENTWORTH, Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
581 So. 2d 259, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6882, 1991 WL 119676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/may-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.