May v. State
This text of 581 So. 2d 259 (May v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause is before us on appeal of appellant’s judgment and sentence for aggravated child abuse. We affirm without discussion the judgment but remand the sentence for correction of a scrivener’s error.
The order withholding adjudication of guilt and placing appellant in community control erroneously states that appellant entered a plea of nolo contendere. As appellant was convicted at bench trial, this apparent scrivener’s error must be corrected.
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed, and the sentence is reversed and remanded for correction of the scrivener’s error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
581 So. 2d 259, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6882, 1991 WL 119676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/may-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.