May v. State Chemical Manufacturing Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

May v. State Chemical Manufacturing Co.

622 P.2d 1156, 50 Or. App. 389, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 2277

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedFebruary 9, 1981

DocketWCB No. 79-3281, CA 18518

StatusPublished

This text of 622 P.2d 1156 (May v. State Chemical Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

May v. State Chemical Manufacturing Co., 622 P.2d 1156, 50 Or. App. 389, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 2277 (Or. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this workers’ compensation case, a determination order had issued awarding claimant 40 percent (128 degrees) for unscheduled disability. The referee found him to be permanently and totally disabled. On the employer’s request for review, the Board reversed the permanent total disability finding and concluded "that the award granted by the Determination Order of 35% unscheduled disability adequately compensates claimant ***.” It restored and affirmed the determination order.

On de novo review, we agree with the Board, but we note that the restored determination order awards 40 percent compensation, not 35 percent.

Affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

In this workers’ compensation case, a determination order had issued awarding claimant 40 percent (128 degrees) for unscheduled disability. The referee found him to be permanently and totally disabled. On the employer’s request for review, the Board reversed the permanent total disability finding and concluded "that the award granted by the Determination Order of 35% unscheduled disability adequately compensates claimant ***.” It restored and affirmed the determination order.

On de novo review, we agree with the Board, but we note that the restored determination order awards 40 percent compensation, not 35 percent.

Affirmed as modified.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

622 P.2d 1156, 50 Or. App. 389, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 2277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/may-v-state-chemical-manufacturing-co-orctapp-1981.