May v. Spears

Court of Appeals of Georgia

May v. Spears

98 S.E. 188, 23 Ga. App. 368, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 127

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 1, 1919

Docket9835

StatusPublished

This text of 98 S.E. 188 (May v. Spears) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

May v. Spears, 98 S.E. 188, 23 Ga. App. 368, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 127 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Stephens, J.

The assignments of error set forth in the motion for new trial and the admendment thereto, complaining of the ruling of the court in excluding certain testimony as therein set out and of certain excerpts from the charge of the court, are without merit. The verdict is amply supported by the- evidence, and the trial court committed no error in overruling the motion for hew trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephens, J.

The assignments of error set forth in the motion for new trial and the admendment thereto, complaining of the ruling of the court in excluding certain testimony as therein set out and of certain excerpts from the charge of the court, are without merit. The verdict is amply supported by the- evidence, and the trial court committed no error in overruling the motion for hew trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

98 S.E. 188, 23 Ga. App. 368, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/may-v-spears-gactapp-1919.