May v. Sheehy
16 F. Cas. 1220, 4 D.C. 135, 4 Cranch 135
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedApril 15, 1831
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 16 F. Cas. 1220 (May v. Sheehy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
May v. Sheehy, 16 F. Cas. 1220, 4 D.C. 135, 4 Cranch 135 (circtddc 1831).
Opinion
(nem con.) permitted the parol evidence to be given; but instructed the jury that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover in this action unless they should be satisfied that the defendant was assignee of the whole estate of the.original lessee.
Verdict for the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bank of Columbia v. French's
1 D.C. 221 (District of Columbia, 1804)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
16 F. Cas. 1220, 4 D.C. 135, 4 Cranch 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/may-v-sheehy-circtddc-1831.