May v. Respass

Fourth Circuit

May v. Respass

487 F. App'x 93

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedNovember 6, 2012

DocketNo. 12-7273

StatusPublished

This text of 487 F. App'x 93 (May v. Respass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

May v. Respass, 487 F. App'x 93 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Anthony May appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the rea[94]*94sons stated by the district court. May v. Respass, 2012 WL 2888405 (2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Anthony May appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the rea[94]*94sons stated by the district court. May v. Respass, 2012 WL 2888405 (2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

487 F. App'x 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/may-v-respass-ca4-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack