May v. Novoa

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 24, 2018·No. 18-1818·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed October 24, 2018.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D18-1818

Lower Tribunal No. 18-13373

Victor May,

Appellant,

vs.

Sandra Novoa, et al.,

Appellees.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Antonio Arzola, Judge.

Victor May, in proper person.

Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman, P.L., and Laura K. Wendell, Eric P.

Hockman, and Richard B. Rosengarten; Abigail Price-Williams, County Attorney, and Oren Rosenthal, Assistant County Attorney, for appellees.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SALTER, and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the initial brief, and finding no preliminary basis for reversal has been demonstrated, the order below is summarily affirmed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a). See Soro v. Soro, 145 So. 3d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014); Fla. Detroit Diesel v. Nathai, 28 So. 3d 182 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (“We conclude that the appellants' initial brief fails to demonstrate a preliminary basis for reversal and we therefore summarily affirm the order without the need for an answer brief.”).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

May v. Novoa, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

May v. Novoa (May v. Novoa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Florida Detroit Diesel v. Nathai
28 So. 3d 182 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Soro v. Soro
145 So. 3d 183 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)