May v. National Fire Insurance

90 S.E. 890, 172 N.C. 795, 1916 N.C. LEXIS 400

• Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
• Decided: December 22, 1916
• Status: Published

Opinion

BkowN, J.

Tbe defendant bases its motion to set aside the judgment upon two grounds, viz., excusable neglect and that the circumstances under which the judgment was rendered make it irregular and void.

We will consider only the second ground.

The facts are that the Superior Court of Swain County, to which the summons in this case was returnable, convened on 6 March, 1916, Long, Judge, presiding. The complaint was filed on 7 March and the answer 18 March.

The judge finds “that the defendant has a good and meritorious defense to plaintiff’s claim; that on 12 March, 1916, the judge presiding left the bench; that he did not adjourn the court, but left it to expire by limitation of law; that it is admitted by the attorneys for the plaintiff and found ■ as a fact that the judge after so leaving the courtroom signed the judgment herein while standing in front of his boarding-house.”

Prior to thus signing the judgment, his Honor had made a general order, as follows: “ . . . and defendants are allowed thirty days thereafter to file answer or demur, except in those cases wherein judgments by default are taken in open court.”

A reference to the calendar will show that 12 March, 1916, was Sunday.

We are of opinion that the judgment was irregular, not being rendered to the due course of judicial proceedings, and voidable, if not absolutely void.

A judgment of the Superior Court, other than strictly “chambers business,” can only be rendered in term, when the court is in session and the judge presiding.

It cannot legally be rendered on the street. When the judge leaves the bench and the term- is left to expire by limitation, the term ends then and there when the judge has finally left the bench. The judge then cannot hear motions or other matters outside of the courtroom except by consent, unless they are such matters as are cognizable at chambers. Delafield v. Construction Co., 115 N. C., 22; Hardee v. Timberlake, 159 N. C., 552.

The orderly course of judicial procedure requires that when the court takes a recess until a certain'hour, the crier should so announce, and when the presiding judge orders an adjournment sine die the crier should so announce, and the time of the adjournment should be entered on the minutes.

Affirmed.