May v. Morgan

110 S.E. 30, 28 Ga. App. 27, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 467
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 15, 1921
Docket12518
StatusPublished

This text of 110 S.E. 30 (May v. Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
May v. Morgan, 110 S.E. 30, 28 Ga. App. 27, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 467 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

Luke, J.

1, A bill of exceptions tendered and certified on May 14,- assigning error upon a judgment rendered in a civil case on April 14, is not subject to dismissal upon the ground that it was not tendered within the time required by law.

2. A motion for a new trial is not the proper mode of testing the correctness of a judgment granting a nonsuit. Buchanan v. James, 134 Ga. 475 (3) (68 S. E. 72).

3. Upon a consideration of the petition in this case and the evidence adduced to sustain the same, it was not error for the court to hold that the plaintiff had not proved his case as laid, and to grant the nonsuit complained of.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Trover; from city court of Valdosta — Judge Crawley presiding. April 14, 1921. J. P. Knight, for plaintiff. R. A. Hendricks, T. N. Hendricks, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Buchanan v. James
68 S.E. 72 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 S.E. 30, 28 Ga. App. 27, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/may-v-morgan-gactapp-1921.