May v. Max B. Cane Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

May v. Max B. Cane Realty Corp.

31 A.D.2d 760, 298 N.Y.S.2d 668, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4749

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 20, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 31 A.D.2d 760 (May v. Max B. Cane Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

May v. Max B. Cane Realty Corp., 31 A.D.2d 760, 298 N.Y.S.2d 668, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4749 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered December 9, 1966, affirmed, with costs to plaintiff against appellant. No opinion. Appeal from purported provisions of said judgment dismissing the third-party complaint dismissed, with costs to the third-party defendant against appellant. The judgment contains n" [761]*761decretal provisions determining the issues with respect to the third-party complaint. However, we have considered the merits of the issues as to the third-party complaint and, if an appeal from the adverse determination against appellant thereon were properly before us, we would have affirmed such determination. Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Martuseello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered December 9, 1966, affirmed, with costs to plaintiff against appellant. No opinion. Appeal from purported provisions of said judgment dismissing the third-party complaint dismissed, with costs to the third-party defendant against appellant. The judgment contains n" [761]*761decretal provisions determining the issues with respect to the third-party complaint. However, we have considered the merits of the issues as to the third-party complaint and, if an appeal from the adverse determination against appellant thereon were properly before us, we would have affirmed such determination. Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Martuseello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A.D.2d 760, 298 N.Y.S.2d 668, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/may-v-max-b-cane-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1969.