May v. Keep

Wisconsin Supreme Court

May v. Keep

2 Pin. 301, 1 Chand. 285

CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

DecidedJune 15, 1849

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 2 Pin. 301 (May v. Keep) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

May v. Keep, 2 Pin. 301, 1 Chand. 285 (Wis. 1849).

Pincite

Opinion

The court determined that it had the power to authorize the issuing of the writ; but in ordinary cases would not feel itself bound to allow it indiscriminately, where there was an opportamity of making application to a circuit court at a term of such a court, and in accordance with this view of the case ordered that the writ issue in case a bond should be executed and filed with the clerk by the parties making this motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The court determined that it had the power to authorize the issuing of the writ; but in ordinary cases would not feel itself bound to allow it indiscriminately, where there was an opportamity of making application to a circuit court at a term of such a court, and in accordance with this view of the case ordered that the writ issue in case a bond should be executed and filed with the clerk by the parties making this motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Pin. 301, 1 Chand. 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/may-v-keep-wis-1849.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack