May v. Justices

Fourth Circuit

May v. Justices

254 F. App'x 963

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 21, 2007·No. No. 07-6728·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Marvin G. May appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, while we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See May v. Justices, No. 1:07-ev-00413TSE (E.D. Va. filed May 1, 2007 & entered May 2, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma[964]*964terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Marvin G. May appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, while we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See May v. Justices, No. 1:07-ev-00413TSE (E.D. Va. filed May 1, 2007 & entered May 2, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma[964]*964terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

May v. Justices, 254 F. App'x 963 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

254 F. App'x 963 (May v. Justices) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.