May v. Hutson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

May v. Hutson

15 S.W. 606, 54 Ark. 226, 1891 Ark. LEXIS 38

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedFebruary 21, 1891

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 15 S.W. 606 (May v. Hutson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

May v. Hutson, 15 S.W. 606, 54 Ark. 226, 1891 Ark. LEXIS 38 (Ark. 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Amendmentof schedule, The petition for a supesedeas filed by the r * ... appellee is defective in two particulars, viz., it does not state that he is a resident of the State, or that it contains a description of all the defendant’s property, both real and personal. Without the allegations of both facts, it was insufficient to warrant the issuance of a supersedeas. Brown v. Peters, 53 Ark., 182. The petition is subject to amendment. If the facts justify it, both defects may be cured by amendment.

Reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Amendmentof schedule, The petition for a supesedeas filed by the r * ... appellee is defective in two particulars, viz., it does not state that he is a resident of the State, or that it contains a description of all the defendant’s property, both real and personal. Without the allegations of both facts, it was insufficient to warrant the issuance of a supersedeas. Brown v. Peters, 53 Ark., 182. The petition is subject to amendment. If the facts justify it, both defects may be cured by amendment.

Reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 S.W. 606, 54 Ark. 226, 1891 Ark. LEXIS 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/may-v-hutson-ark-1891.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack