May v. Hutson

15 S.W. 606, 54 Ark. 226, 1891 Ark. LEXIS 38
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided February 21, 1891·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Amendmentof schedule, The petition for a supesedeas filed by the r * ... appellee is defective in two particulars, viz., it does not state that he is a resident of the State, or that it contains a description of all the defendant’s property, both real and personal. Without the allegations of both facts, it was insufficient to warrant the issuance of a supersedeas. Brown v. Peters, 53 Ark., 182. The petition is subject to amendment. If the facts justify it, both defects may be cured by amendment.

Reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

May v. Hutson, 15 S.W. 606, 54 Ark. 226, 1891 Ark. LEXIS 38 (Ark. 1891).

15 S.W. 606 (May v. Hutson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. Swann
251 S.W.2d 111 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1952)
LaMode Garment Co. v. Moore & Co.
81 S.W.2d 841 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1935)