May v. Heiner

32 F.2d 1017, 7 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 8771, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 3963, 7 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 8771
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided January 9, 1929·No. No. 3811·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, on the opinion of the court below [25 F.(2d) 1004], with the observation that this case is distinguished from Nichols v. Coolidge, 274 U. S. 531, 47 S. Ct. 710; 71 L. Ed. 1184, 52 A. L. R. 1081, on the facts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

May v. Heiner, 32 F.2d 1017, 7 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 8771, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 3963, 7 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 8771 (3d Cir. 1929).

32 F.2d 1017 (May v. Heiner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commissioner v. Estate of Church
335 U.S. 632 (Supreme Court, 1949)