May v. Heiner
32 F.2d 1017, 7 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 8771, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 3963, 7 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 8771
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedJanuary 9, 1929
DocketNo. 3811
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 32 F.2d 1017 (May v. Heiner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
May v. Heiner, 32 F.2d 1017, 7 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 8771, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 3963, 7 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 8771 (3d Cir. 1929).
Opinion
Affirmed, on the opinion of the court below [25 F.(2d) 1004], with the observation that this case is distinguished from Nichols v. Coolidge, 274 U. S. 531, 47 S. Ct. 710; 71 L. Ed. 1184, 52 A. L. R. 1081, on the facts.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commissioner v. Estate of Church
335 U.S. 632 (Supreme Court, 1949)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
32 F.2d 1017, 7 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 8771, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 3963, 7 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 8771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/may-v-heiner-ca3-1929.