May v. Graham

Court of Appeals of Georgia

May v. Graham

101 S.E. 699, 24 Ga. App. 527, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 898

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedDecember 9, 1919

Docket10571

StatusPublished

This text of 101 S.E. 699 (May v. Graham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

May v. Graham, 101 S.E. 699, 24 Ga. App. 527, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 898 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence and the assignments of error in this case have been carefully examined. The verdict was not contrary to the evidence, and the rulings upon the admissibility of evidence were not harmful. Civil Code (1910), § 4504. The case was fully and fairly submitted to the jury. For no reason assigned do we find that it was error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Action for slander; from city court of Eastman—Judge Griffin. April 5, 1919.

G. W. Atwill, for plaintiff. D. D. Smith, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI