May v. First Division of the St Paul & Pacific Railroad
This text of 1 N.W. 584 (May v. First Division of the St Paul & Pacific Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The complaint is good. The essential facts, required by the rules of pleading to be stated positively, are the title of plaintiffs, and the wrongful taking possession and detention by the defendants. The track of the railroad is mere matter of description. It was never heard of, that, in ejectment, mere matters of description, such as the monuments bounding the land, must be averred with the certainty and positiveness required in pleading the material facts constituting the cause of action.
The allegation of the0 taking and holding is sufficient.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 N.W. 584, 26 Minn. 74, 1879 Minn. LEXIS 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/may-v-first-division-of-the-st-paul-pacific-railroad-minn-1879.