May v. Ferrill

22 Tex. 340
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1858
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 22 Tex. 340 (May v. Ferrill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
May v. Ferrill, 22 Tex. 340 (Tex. 1858).

Opinion

Wheeler, Ch. J.

Unquestionably, it was competent for the court, to permit the clerk to supply his omission to attach his certificate to the affidavit, made to obtain the writ of sequestration.

There is no statement of facts; nor does it appear, by the bill of exceptions,, what was testified to by the witnesses objected to. Nor can it be seen that the exclusion of evidence, offered by the defendant, can possibly have operated any injury to him. It is unnecessary to consider objections to the judgment, not properly presented by the record, for revision; or which are plainly without any foundation.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shapiro v. Sampson Bros. & Cooper, Inc.
334 S.W.2d 200 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1960)
Southern Surety Co. v. Adams
278 S.W. 943 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Strickland v. Wofford
156 S.W. 916 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Texas Banking & Investment Co. v. T. S. Reed Grocery Co.
137 S.W. 162 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1911)
Gray & Wallace v. Steedman Bros.
63 Tex. 95 (Texas Supreme Court, 1885)
Haby v. Koenig
3 Tex. L. R. 221 (Texas Supreme Court, 1884)
Lanier v. Perryman
59 Tex. 104 (Texas Supreme Court, 1883)
Litton v. Thompson
2 Posey 577 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1879)
Nettles v. State
4 Tex. Ct. App. 337 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1878)
Foreman v. Carter
9 Kan. 674 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1872)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 Tex. 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/may-v-ferrill-tex-1858.