May v. Ferrill
This text of 22 Tex. 340 (May v. Ferrill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unquestionably, it was competent for the court, to permit the clerk to supply his omission to attach his certificate to the affidavit, made to obtain the writ of sequestration.
There is no statement of facts; nor does it appear, by the bill of exceptions,, what was testified to by the witnesses objected to. Nor can it be seen that the exclusion of evidence, offered by the defendant, can possibly have operated any injury to him. It is unnecessary to consider objections to the judgment, not properly presented by the record, for revision; or which are plainly without any foundation.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 Tex. 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/may-v-ferrill-tex-1858.